Which is the better IVTC script?

[SegNin]

Found two versions of an avs script for telecined anime in the tutorial section.

This one's older: http://www.animemusicvideos.org/guides/ ... ssive.html
MPEG2Source ("C:\yourfolder\blah.d2v")
deint = TDeint(mode=2, mtnmode=3, blim=100)
TFM(cthresh=4, slow=2, clip2=deint)
TDecimate(mode=1)

This one's newer: http://www.animemusicvideos.org/guides/ ... ssive.html
MPEG2Source ("C:\yourfolder\blah.d2v")
TFM(slow=2, pp=5, clip2=TDeint(mode=2, type=3))
TDecimate()

Before you say go with the newer one, notice how that one doesn't have mode=1 for TDecimate?
Because I thought that parameter was required for anime/cartoon sources.
So, I'm not sure about the newer one. Should I use that one with or without mode = 1? Could the older one be the better choice? A little help here, please.

[l33tmeatwad]

It is actually a preference thing, some people prefer the older one over the newer one. IIRC, TIVTC has more features overall but some claim it doesn't handle some sources quite as well.

[SegNin]

Should I use mode = 1 for Tdecimate with the newer one even though the tutorial has it blank there?
The source is anime.

[Scintilla]

It is actually a preference thing, some people prefer the older one over the newer one. IIRC, TIVTC has more features overall but some claim it doesn't handle some sources quite as well.

But both of those examples use TIVTC -- and by the way, does anyone know why both of them don't just use TFM(d2v="C:\yourfolder\blah.d2v")? Shouldn't getting hints from the D2V file make the field matching far more accurate?

[Kionon]

I'm pretty sure I've only used the older one. *shrug*

[SegNin]

Alright, after reading through this guide and gaining a better understanding of those settings, I've settled on this as my script.
What do you guys think?

mpeg2source("C:\v\6.d2v")
LoadPlugin("C:\Users\J\Desktop\MAIN\OTHER PROGRAMS\MeGUI_2525_x86\tools\avisynth_plugin\TDeint.dll")
TFM(d2v = "C:\v\6.d2v", cthresh=4, slow=2, clip2=TDeint(mode=2, type=3))
TDecimate(mode=1)

[l33tmeatwad]

It is actually a preference thing, some people prefer the older one over the newer one. IIRC, TIVTC has more features overall but some claim it doesn't handle some sources quite as well.

But both of those examples use TIVTC -- and by the way, does anyone know why both of them don't just use TFM(d2v="C:\yourfolder\blah.d2v")? Shouldn't getting hints from the D2V file make the field matching far more accurate?

Geez, I totally derped that...